Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Silly Ron



As of right now, I am a Ron Paul supporter. I believe that he would be the best president out of the field of candidates. His electability is more in question to me because of this Hot Air article. Pay particular attention to the second bold paragraph which talks about his "racist comments". In his newsletter named Ron Paul Political Report, it was quoted to have said, in regard to the 1992 LA riots, “Order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks.” There are also some other racy quotes in the article.






Paul's electability was already in question because of his radical ideas. His opponents are certain to disclose his newsletter's comments if Paul makes it to the general election. This almost garauntees Obama's 99% black vote (exaggeration) to go to 100%.






I will still vote for him because I think he is the best candidate. I would bet all my money that he won't get elected. After all, who wouldnt elect a man like this:









Posted by at

12 comments:

  1. KPDecember 20, 2011 at 12:09 PM

    Crazy Uncle Ron's Racist Rants caught of video

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3EADdr-5AY

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousDecember 20, 2011 at 1:44 PM

    As much as I usually disagree with Jon Stewart's political sentiment, I like and enjoy watching him expose mainstream media's discontent with Ron Paul.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tb5aGgQXhXo&feature=related

    -ToeJamm

    ReplyDelete
  3. KPDecember 20, 2011 at 5:48 PM

    Interesting video...

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/12/10/1044056/-Ron-Pauls-Eye-Opening-Ad-on-our-Wars-This-Ad-Needs-to-go-Viral

    ReplyDelete
  4. KPDecember 20, 2011 at 5:56 PM

    Busted! Ron Paul racist rant caught on tape!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=i3EADdr-5AY#!

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousDecember 22, 2011 at 6:19 AM

    I like Paul's domesitc policies and his stance on ending the Fed, but I can't vote for Ron Paul based on his foreign policy and his stance on the war on drugs: he doesn't view Iran as the threat that it is and I am against ending the war on drugs. I read a really good argument against the war on drugs in a book I have been reading.

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousDecember 22, 2011 at 6:22 AM

    I like one of the comments supposedly made by Paul about the LA riots. "Order was only restored in L.A.," the publication opined, "when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks."
    http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/opinionla/la-ed-riots-20111221,0,4021954.story

    ReplyDelete
  7. ToeJammDecember 22, 2011 at 8:39 AM

    Hey Jeff, evidently you didnt read the post.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Bud-DDecember 22, 2011 at 12:03 PM

    I'll respond with a completely objective, thoroughly sourced and footnoted evaluation of Dr Paul...when I get around to it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. AnonymousDecember 23, 2011 at 2:06 PM

    Yeah, I was trying to keep up with all of the posts. I based my opinion on Paul on what he said during the debates and especially this last one. He thinks Iran is not pursuing a bomb and he understand why they would want one. He believed that Bush used 911 as an excuse to go into Iraq. He blames America for the attacks of 911 because we had bases around the world. http://www.theblaze.com/stories/ron-paul-bush-administration-was-gleeful-after-911-attacks/

    Here is some commentary on Paul's quotes from the last debate http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2011/12/16/ron_paul_puts_on_the_tinfoil_hat

    "PAUL: Yes. Eh, eh, all we're doing is promoting their desire to have it. They are surrounded! They have a desire -- and how do we treat people when they have a nuclear weapon? With a lot more respect. What did we do with Libya? We talked to them, we talked them out of their nuclear weapon and then we killed him. So it makes more sense to work with people and the whole thing that nuclear weapons are loaded over there. Pakistan. India. Israel has 300 of 'em! We have our ships there. We gotta get it in a proper context!"

    The thing is that Israel is led by a crazy guy that wants to wipe a nation off the face of the map.

    ReplyDelete
  10. AnonymousDecember 24, 2011 at 2:25 PM

    The last sentence should read that Israel is not led by a crazy guy that wants to wipe a nation off the face of the map.

    ReplyDelete
  11. ToeJammDecember 26, 2011 at 1:38 PM

    The famous "wipe israel of the face of the map" has been grossly mistranslated.

    It really means : "Imam said this occupying regime in Jerusalem must vanish from the page of times." (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sam-sedaei/the-biggest-lie-told-to-t_b_70248.html)

    I understand that the correct translation has evil intent, I think it is a little less malicious. I wonder why the media has mistranlated so blatantly?

    ReplyDelete
  12. AnonymousDecember 28, 2011 at 4:45 AM

    "If Bachmann was wrong in alleging a genocidal threat, then so was virtually the entire House of Representatives, who voted 411-2 to urge the U.N. Security Council to bring charges against Iran's president for violating the 1948 Geneva Convention by threatening to wipe Israel off the map."

    Ahmadinejad promises a second Holocaust by means that only a nuclear weapon could produce -- "[t]he Zionist regime...will be eliminated by one storm" -- followed by attacks on the West: "The rage of the Muslim peoples will not be restricted to the boundaries of our region[.] The waves of the explosion ... will reach the corrupt forces [i.e., the Western countries] which support this fake regime [Israel]."

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/12/bachmann_vs_the_fact-checkers_did_iran_threaten_nuclear_attack_on_us.html

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)