What is the goal of the climate conference that will be held in Copenhagen?

Here is a prime example of how the manufactured "climate crises" is being used for a smoke screen and a means to gain the support of people to achieve the goal of growing the size and power of government. This article is from World Net Daily,

A former science

adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher says the real purpose of the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen on Dec. 7-18 is to use global warming hype as a pretext to lay the foundation for a one-world government."[...] 'I read that treaty and what it says is this: that a world government is going to be created. The word 'government' actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity.'

I have not done any research on this Monckton guy; so I can not say that he is a credible source, but I do agree with his views on global warming not being caused by man. I don't know about some one-world government, but one of the purpose of this conference is clearly to grow the size and power of the various governments of the world and to possibly create some international regulatory body. I think there is enough scientific evidence to prove that man is not causing climate change. So then why do we need new legislation and new government powers to combat a non-existent crises? This is hard to figure out. I might have the answer in the next couple of years. It is sad that there are too many people that just don't think critically. Another purpose of this conference sounds very similar to President Obama's desire to spreading the wealth around.

'"The second purpose is the transfer of wealth from the countries of the West to Third World countries, in satisfaction of what is called, coyly, 'climate debt' – because we've been burning CO2 and they haven't. We've been screwing up the climate and they haven't. And the third purpose of this new entity, this government is enforcement.'"[...] "Moncton is a well-known critic of the theory of anthropogenic causes for global warming who has argued repeatedly that global warming hysteria is an ideological position of the political Left advanced in the interest of imposing global taxes on the United States in the pursuit of international control of the U.S. economy under a one-world government to be administered by the U.N."[...]'So, thank you, America. You were the beacon of freedom to the world. It is a privilege to stand on this soil of freedom while it is still free,' he continued. 'But, in the next few weeks, unless you stop it, your president will sign your freedom, your democracy, and your humanity away forever.'

How is this allowed to come about? By creating a fake crises that requires more government to advert disaster. This also sounds very familiar to our President's views on spreading the wealth around.

Why do the governments of the world need to increase their size and create more regulations that increases the power of these governments to solve an obviously non-existent crises? Are there really that many dumb people? I think most of the people who ascribe to the belief that man is causing the climate to change are just blindly following bad science, but those at the top are using the climate crises as a way to gain support for increasing the size and power of the various governments of the world and to enact a globalist agenda. Combating climate change also means that America will be weakened. Maybe this one-world government sounds stupid, but combating climate changes is definitly not about the climate. What is it being used for then?