Friday, September 10, 2010

Why does Obama want to "fundamentally transform" America?


Why does President Obama's policies seem to be aimed at redistributing America's wealth and destructive to America's economy? Why does he view America as an evil Country that has been the source of great injustices throughout its history? Why does he chose to surround himself with socialist and communist who have openly espoused the very same goal of fundamentally transforming America that entails the destruction of America as we know it? Why is he compromising our national security by contributing $2.5260 trillion to our national debt, which is more than the cumulative debt of all Presidents from Washington through Reagan? Why does he support a victory Mosque being built near Ground Zero by our enemy? Basically he is a foreigner and an enemy of America-- by foreigner I mean culturally and by enemy I mean one who is dedicated to the destruction of the last remnants of America as it was founded. This article explains the roots of President Obama and provides some insight into what motivates him and might explain his reasoning behind his transformative policies.

"Here is a man who spent his formative years--the first 17 years of his life--off the American mainland, in Hawaii, Indonesia and Pakistan, with multiple subsequent journeys to Africa." If this statement is true than this would technically make him America's first foreign, culturally, President. This would also explain why he does not believe in American exceptionalism.

The article goes on to explain who his father was and takes a look at Obama's book "Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance" to see what these dreams were.
But to his son, the elder Obama represented a great and noble cause, the cause of anticolonialism. Anticolonialism is the doctrine that rich countries of the West got rich by invading, occupying and looting poor countries of Asia, Africa and South America. As one of Obama's acknowledged intellectual influences, Frantz Fanon, wrote in The Wretched of the Earth, 'The well-being and progress of Europe have been built up with the sweat and the dead bodies of Negroes, Arabs, Indians and the yellow races.' Obama Sr. was an economist, and in 1965 he published an important article in the East Africa Journal called 'Problems Facing Our Socialism.' Obama Sr. wasn't a doctrinaire socialist; rather, he saw state appropriation of wealth as a necessary means to achieve the anticolonial objective of taking resources away from the foreign looters and restoring them to the people of Africa. [Might this explain the President's previous statements in 2001?] It may seem incredible to suggest that the anticolonial ideology of Barack Obama Sr. is espoused by his son, the President of the United States. That is what I am saying. From a very young age and through his formative years, Obama learned to see America as a force for global domination and destruction. He came to view America's military as an instrument of neocolonial occupation. He adopted his father's position that capitalism and free markets are code words for economic plunder. Obama grew to perceive the rich as an oppressive class, a kind of neocolonial power within America. In his worldview, profits are a measure of how effectively you have ripped off the rest of society, and America's power in the world is a measure of how selfishly it consumes the globe's resources and how ruthlessly it bullies and dominates the rest of the planet.[Might this explain why he is pushing for a Cap and Trade system that would help to redistribute America's resources throughout the world?] But instead of readying us for the challenge, our President is trapped in his father's time machine. Incredibly, the U.S. is being ruled according to the dreams of a Luo tribesman of the 1950s. This philandering, inebriated African socialist, who raged against the world for denying him the realization of his anticolonial ambitions, is now setting the nation's agenda through the reincarnation of his dreams in his son. The son makes it happen, but he candidly admits he is only living out his father's dream. The invisible father provides the inspiration, and the son dutifully gets the job done. America today is governed by a ghost.[Imagine the ghost of despotic African ruler.] (All [ ] indicate my words.)
Most of us on this blog are aware of Obama's major reforms: the stimulus package that did nothing for the economy but put us into greater debt, his attempts to slow our economy down and redistribute America's wealth to the world by regulating carbon emissions through a cap and trade scheme, health care reform, and financial reform. These reforms take on a new meaning if Obama holds these views as it would indicate what the goals of these reforms are: the humbling/leveling of America and the redistribution of our wealth. If he holds the views then this makes him a very dangerous man to America because he views it as an evil Country that must pay for its sins. If one did hold these views what would you do as the President of America? One thing is for certain: that Obama plans on "fundamentally transforming" America.

3 comments:

  1. Great article. Dinesh D'Souza totally nails it, as do you. What's amazing is that this was there for everyone to see if they cared to look for it. The press completely ignores it. A good complimentary article to this is by my hero Victor Davis Hanson http://pajamasmedia.com/victordavishanson/the-origins-of-barack-obamas-petulance/

    where he totally focuses on the free pass Obama has been given by the press throughout his career, ignoring the very things you talk about above.

    This is exactly why he so clearly hates the British so much. Why they loved him when it was clear long before he was in the White House that he felt this way is beyond me.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The British beat his father or grand father and that is the reason Obama returned the bust of Churchill's as one of his 1st acts as President.If the media did its job, Americans would have known who Obama is. The main stream media has its own agenda and is owned basically does the bidding of the government. I would say that a lot more Americans agree with Obama's world view and his views about America than you would think. Although most Americans don't have such a personal and deep seated hatred of America, they do hold a more mild version of Obama's: capitalism is bad, the rich are bad, America has been more of a force for bad in the world etc.

    As the article notes, how can Obama ban oil drilling in America yet send billions to Brazil for them to drill over there? The same for Mexico? His world view explains this.

    The main point about Obama's worldview is how does this reflect on his agenda and policies? Most people assume when judging the effectiveness of his policies that he wants to improve our economy and create a more prosperous America and are amazed when they have the exact opposite effect. The policies that he has passed are working exacting as he wants them to: bring America down to size and redistributing the wealth around. Health care is about smoothing out the income inequalities and will help bankrupt our nation, the stimulus bill was not about improving the economy but spreading the wealth around and putting the Country into massive debt, the cap and trade he wanted passed had nothing to do about the environment but was about spreading the wealth on a global level, financial reform was not about preventing the next economic downturn but was about the government gaining control of the financial sector, bailing out GM and the shittest car company ever, drive their products as my family has owned a lot of these cars, Chrysler was about taking over the car industry, and etc. People need to learn the true nature of Obama and his real goals.

    The fact is that America got scammed in part by the media and mostly by themselves into electing an enemy and foreigner. Thanks in part by a well-spoken black man that made white people feel like they were atoning for the sins of the past. I remember being in class and people getting a hard on or wet over the election of this man when I brought up anything negative about him, they told me I needed to look at the historical nature of his election a black man. He has passed a lot of his agenda and the damage done to our Country will simply not be undone anytime soon. The real problem is the fact that people would vote for such a man. This America can not survive.

    ReplyDelete
  3. D'Souza is a smart man. I saw him at Good Sheppard give an apologist speech for the Christian Church. I like what he has to say in this article.

    ReplyDelete